Are results from non-hypothetical choice-based conjoint analysis and non-hypothetical recoded-ranking conjoint analyses similar?
Abstract
Conflicting findings have been found in previous research that compared choice-based conjoint analysis and ranking conjoint analysis in a public good setting. The present paper revisits this issue for a private good in a non-hypothetical context using small and large choice sets. Our results suggest that in a small choice set setting, participants’ preferences and willingness to pay are similar across the two conjoint analysis formats. However, in large choice sets, a divergence between the two conjoint analysis formats emerges. Hence, the two conjoint analysis formats can only be used interchangeably in small choice sets, not in large choice sets.
Journal Title/Title of Proceedings
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume/Issue Number
95:4
Page Numbers
1‐15