Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoss SA
dc.contributor.authorChagunda MGG
dc.contributor.authorTopp CFE
dc.contributor.authorEnnos R
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-31T15:23:31Z
dc.date.available2015-03-31T15:23:31Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citation170en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.09.011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11262/10693
dc.description.abstractImproving milk production through livestock feeding and genetics is a promising approach for reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from dairy production systems. This study investigated emissions intensity, defined as the global warming potential (GWP) per unit energy corrected milk (ECM) output, of high-producing dairy systems. Objectives of this study were: to determine the effect of forage regime and cattle genetic line on GHG emissions from the life cycle of four directly comparable dairy production systems; to examine differences amongst contributing GHG emissions sources, and to identify key parameters contributing the most uncertainty in overall GWP. Life cycle analysis (LCA) was conducted based on seven years data collected from a long-term Holstein-Friesian genetic and management systems project. The four dairy production systems comprised two feeding regimes of High and Low Forage applied to each of two genetic lines. The Control line represented the average UK genetics and Select line representing the top 5% of UK genetics for milk fat and protein. Select genetic line animals managed under Low Forage regime was estimated to hold potential to reduce emissions intensity by 24% compared to Control genetic merit cows managed under a High Forage regime. Individually, improving genetic merit of the herd and implementing Low Forage regime hold potential to reduce emissions intensity by 9% and 16%, respectively. Key factors in the differences amongst systems were greater off-farm emissions under Low Forage regime, and greater on-farm nitrous oxide emissions associated with High Forage. In contrast to overall emissions, the emissions intensity was lower in Low Forage groups than in High Forage groups because of high milk yield in Low Forage groups. Six key parameters contained the greatest influence on uncertainty in results. These included: three Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) coefficients concerning indirect emissions from volatilized nitrogen (EF4), direct nitrous oxide emissions from nitrogen input to soil (EF1), and emissions from direct deposition of excreta at pasture (EF3PRP); and three system-specific emissions factors for animals’ excreted nitrogen rate, enteric methane and manure methane. The coefficients EF4, EF1, and EF3PRP should be prioritized for better definition in order to minimize uncertainty in future studies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isformatof13940en_US
dc.relation.ispartofLivestock Scienceen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Livestock Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Livestock Science, [170, December 2014)]DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.09.011
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectDairyen_US
dc.subjectForageen_US
dc.subjectGenotypeen_US
dc.subjectGreenhouse gasen_US
dc.subjectEmissions intensityen_US
dc.titleEffect of cattle genotype and feeding regime on greenhouse gas emissions intensity in high producing dairy cowsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscripten
dc.extent.pageNumbers158en_US
dc.extent.pageNumbers171en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record